4 edition of Soil and vegetation response to soil compaction and forest floor removal after aspen harvesting found in the catalog.
Soil and vegetation response to soil compaction and forest floor removal after aspen harvesting
by North Central Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service--U.S. Dept. of Agriculture in St. Paul, Minn. (1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul 55108)
Written in English
|Statement||David H. Alban ... [et al.]|
|Series||Research paper NC -- 315|
|Contributions||Alban, David H, North Central Forest Experiment Station (Saint Paul, Minn.)|
|The Physical Object|
What causes soil compaction? Soil compaction is caused by tilling, harvesting, or grazing when the soils are wet. Soil water content influences compaction. A dry soil is much more resistant to compaction than a moist or wet soil. Other factors affecting compaction include the texture, pressure exerted, composition (texture, organic matter. Impact of Forest Operation on Soil Compaction – San Rossore Case Study. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(4): – The paper presents the assessment of compaction grade caused by machinery used in forest biomass for energy harvesting. The main aim was to determinate unaﬀ ected soil conditions Cited by: 1.
Soil compaction is a problem in many landscapes. A recent survey of arborists estimated that 40 percent of commercial and residential properties had an area of significant soil compaction near trees. Historically, grounds managers have had few options for correcting this problem. Fortunately, recent advances have made it easier to effectively treat compaction problems . But soil ruts, the modification of soil by the penetration of the soil by wheels or tracks because of a bearing capacity failure of the soil, is the focus of the current Forest Soils Conservation Guidelines. Soil rutting is of primary concern for several reasons: 1. Soil structure is destroyed and organic horizons mixed with mineral soil. This can.
Soil damage on forest roads and landings includes the removal of the organic layer and topsoil, soil compaction, and erosion of the exposed soil. The soil damage affects hillslope infiltration and surface and subsurface flows. If significant, the resulting erosion. could be a major source ol- nutrient IOSS foP-he harvest (Binkley, ). Alban, David H.: Soil and vegetation response to soil compaction and forest floor removal after aspen harvesting / ([St. Paul, Minn.]: North Central Forest Experiment Station, ) (page images at HathiTrust).
Meditations on the cross
Teague, Shenkin and Sawney
Classics in Science
songs of Homer.
Chinese decorative arts... which will be sold by auction by Sotheby Parke Bernet & Co... Friday, 15thJune, 1979...
German liberalism in the nineteenth century
Pinky and Rex and the Double-Dad Weekend, Homework
Study of the computer-based systems safety practices of UK, European and US industry
Twelve sonatas, for alto recorder and continuo, op. 2.
History of the Jews
Get this from a library. Soil and vegetation response to soil compaction and forest floor removal after aspen harvesting. [David H Alban; North Central. Response of forest vegetation and foliar δ13C and δ15N to soil compaction and forest floor removal in a boreal aspen forest Article in Forest Ecology and Management (s 1–3)– Alban, D.
et al Soil and vegetation response to soil compaction and forest floor removal after aspen ch Paper North Central Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest NCCited by: The effects of severe soil compaction and whole tree harvesting plus forest floor removal (referred to below as forest floor removal) on understory cover and species composition, and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) growth and foliar δ 13 C and δ 15 N were investigated in a boreal aspen forest near Dawson Creek, BC, Cited by: soil properties following forest harvesting and application of soil compaction and forest floor removal treatments, and to measure responses by the forest regeneration and herba-ceous vegetation.
We report results on aspen stocking and growth; biomass production of aspen and associated vegeta-tion after five growing seasons; and on forest floor. Soil compaction associated with cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting of a coniferous forest Sang-Kyun Han, Han-Sup Han, Deborah S.
Page-Dumroese, and Leonard R. Johnson Abstract: The degree and extent of soil compaction, which may reduce productivity of forest soils, is believed to vary byCited by: Soil enzymes are linked to microbial functions and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems and are considered sensitive to soil disturbances.
We investigated the effects of severe soil compaction and whole-tree harvesting plus forest floor removal (referred to as FFR below, compared with stem-only harvesting) on available N, microbial biomass C (MBC), Cited by: Timber harvest impacts the understorey vegetation through physical disruption of the forest floor (e.g.
erosion, root damage, soil compaction) and/or by altering microenvironmental conditions. Three hypotheses tested are: (1) soil compaction will negatively affect both aboveground biomass of planted trees by themselves and aboveground biomass of total vegetation (trees + competing vegetation), and the trends will be consistent at 5, 10, and 20 years of plantation growth; (2) both whole-tree harvest and whole-tree plus forest floor Cited by: 6.
Aspen height growth Scalping of forest floor significantly reduced aspen height compared to the stem only and whole tree harvest treat-ments after the second year of growth (Figure 2).
The lowest mean heights for aspen were also found on the forest floor removal treatments in the U.S. LTSP aspen sites, regardless of soil texture (Stone Microbial community responses in forest mineral soil to compaction, organic matter removal, and vegetation control1 Matt D.
Busse, Samual E. Beattie, Robert F. Powers, Felipe G. Sanchez, and Allan E. Tiarks Abstract: We tested three disturbance hypotheses in young conifer plantations: H: soil compaction and removal ofCited by: Search SpringerLink. Search.
Erratum to: Soil compaction and forest floor removal reduced microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a boreal aspen forest soil. Soil compaction and forest floor removal reduced microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a boreal aspen forest soil.
Biol Fertil So () doi Cited by: soil properties and produce both onsite and offsite impacts on forest and related resources. Soil compaction is one commonly observed consequence of the use of machinery on forest sites. The negative impacts of soil compaction on these sites include the reduced growth of seedlings and residual trees and, in someFile Size: 1MB.
This plot at the Chippewa National Forest (shown 17 years after harvest) received the most severe treatment, a combination of whole-tree harvest, forest floor removal, and heavy compaction.
This work was made possible by the efforts of many USDA Forest Service scientists and technicians who started the Long Term Soil Productivity study two.
Relationships between Soil Compaction and Harvest Season, Soil Texture, and Landscape Position for Aspen Forests Randy Kolka, Aaron Steber, Ken Brooks, Charles H.
Perry, and Matt Powers Although a number of harvesting studies have assessed compaction, no study has considered the interacting relationships of harvest season, soil texture, andCited by: 8. We used six long-term soil productivity (LTSP) sites in the interior of British Columbia, Canada to test the effects of organic-matter removal and soil compaction on forest health, and to explore the relationship between forest health response and potential indicators of site sensitivity: mineral soil pH, base saturation, carbon to nitrogen Cited by: 2.
EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF VEGETATION COVER ON SOIL COMPACTION Patrik Burg, Vladimir Masan, Pavel Zemanek Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic @ Abstract. In terms of ensuring the sustainability and permanent soil fertility, the key role in viticulture is played by short-term and permanent greening in the Size: KB.
FOREST HARVESTING DISTURBANCE AND SITE PREPARATION EFFECTS ON SOIL PROCESSES AND VEGETATION IN A YOUNG PINE PLANTATION by Tonya W. Lister Dr. James A. Burger, Chairman Forestry (ABSTRACT) The favorable growth of young loblolly pines (Pinus taeda L.) in response to controlling non-crop vegetation is well documented.
However. Soil and vegetation response to soil compaction and forest floor removal after aspen harvesting. Res. Pap. NC Saint Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
8 p. Aspen clearcutting increases snowmelt and storm flow peaks in north central Minnesota. Water Resources Bulletin. Soil Science Society of America Journal Abstract - Forest, Range & Wildland Soils Soil Nutrient Dynamics after Harvesting and Slash Treatments in Boreal Aspen Stands Chipping reduced forest floor microbial N concentration by 25% and increased microbial C/N by 28% but had no impact on nutrient availability.
Differences between WTH and SOH. desired forest vegetation. r Maintaining soil productivity is key to sustainable forest management. r Maintaining forest soil productivity is less costly than correction or mitigation, such as trying to fix damaged soils after the fact.
r Soil productivity influences what plants can grow on a site (or in the forest) and how well they grow. Bedding fully ameliorated the effects of soil compaction based on the physical properties measured.
Trends suggest some improvements in soil quality with increasing levels of non-crop vegetation biomass; however, during 2 yr of operational vegetation control, the beneficial effects of the non-crop vegetation were marginal.Forest Floor, Soil, andVegetation Responses to Sludge Fertilization in Red and White Pine Plantations.
Soil Science Society of America Journal 47(4): Keywords: Pinus resinosa Ait., Pinus strobus L., forest fertilization, soil fertility, foliar nutrition, site productivity, heavy metals.
Posted Date: April 1, ; Modified Date: August Cited by: